magicJack  and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks Forum Index

magicJack and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks


magicJack and magicJack Plus Unofficial Technical Support. Your Magic Jack and Magic Jack Plus phone service information resource
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Magic Jack a resource Hog?



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    magicJack and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks Forum Index -> Magic Jack Technical Support
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hartterc
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:58 pm    Post subject: Magic Jack a resource Hog? Reply with quote

I recently did a (ctrl alt delete) and brought up Task manager to check what's running and noticed that Magic is using a tone of system resources, to be excact it is sitting at 50,616k Mem usage. I'm running XP. It never did this before, It usually sits around 5,00k any ideas?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bitstopjoe
Future magicJack CEO


Joined: 13 Sep 2008
Posts: 2844
Location: North East Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Magic Jack a resource Hog? Reply with quote

hartterc wrote:
I recently did a (ctrl alt delete) and brought up Task manager to check what's running and noticed that Magic is using a tone of system resources, to be excact it is sitting at 50,616k Mem usage. I'm running XP. It never did this before, It usually sits around 5,00k any ideas?


Only 15,712k here of mem usage with XP SP3. And I have it set for HIGH priority.


Joe Sica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
tsmith
Dan isn't smart enough to hire me


Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Posts: 420
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

18,900k and set to HIGH also. XP SP3.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
hartterc
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Priority is set to normal. Does it matter what you have set at? Still No answer on how much resource it should take.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tsmith
Dan isn't smart enough to hire me


Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Posts: 420
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just checked it again and it's down to 8,6xxk, so it varies. I don't know what the average is, but it seems 50k is extremely high. You may want to check it again and see how much it's taking up now.

Setting its priority to HIGH gives it a better chance of remaining consistently effective, above all other processes that are constantly trying to grab the CPU's limited resources. You might have known that already. I've experimented with it, and it seems to work better set to HIGH.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
hartterc
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok I have it set to High. Right now it's sitting at 18,576k. Will see what happens in a few. Thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nitemare
MagicJack User


Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How much RAM do you have? What are your PC specs? I bet you have an older PC and minimum ram. If not, your install of XP needs to be fixed up (or reformatted).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hartterc
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

2gigs of memory P4 3.4 on a fresh install of XP Pro. Service Pack 3. 800watt power supply.

Just checked again today and we are back up to 49,248K
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tsmith
Dan isn't smart enough to hire me


Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Posts: 420
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With MJ active and say, offhook with the Echo test, my MJ process increases to around 38,000k+. Once I hang up, it decreases to around 26,000k or so. When I minimize it, it drops to around 6-7000k and hovers around that number. So you're at the 50k mark while your MJ's minimized?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bitstopjoe
Future magicJack CEO


Joined: 13 Sep 2008
Posts: 2844
Location: North East Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tsmith wrote:
With MJ active and say, offhook with the Echo test, my MJ process increases to around 38,000k+. Once I hang up, it decreases to around 26,000k or so. When I minimize it, it drops to around 6-7000k and hovers around that number. So you're at the 50k mark while your MJ's minimized?


Hey Tom stop minimizing the situation!!!! Smile


Joe Sica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
tsmith
Dan isn't smart enough to hire me


Joined: 18 Jan 2010
Posts: 420
Location: Utah

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But I'm only minimizing minimally! Mr. Green
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bitstopjoe
Future magicJack CEO


Joined: 13 Sep 2008
Posts: 2844
Location: North East Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tsmith wrote:
But I'm only minimizing minimally!


Oh well, that's different...................... never mind...


Smile

Joe Sica
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
hartterc
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn't make a difference if it's minimized or not. Right now it's 47,196 and it is minimized?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KMNugent52
Dan isn't smart enough to hire me


Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 100
Location: N.E. Georgia

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hartterc,
After reading your OP, I decided to check on my own setup.
Just so you know, you're not alone.
I'm running an HP t5700 thin client w/Win XPe SP2, 512 DOM, 512 RAM.
magicjack.exe priority @ high 13.
Task Manager showed magicjack.exe memory use @ 50,500k
After a reboot, it's now @ 22,368.
I'll look back in on it later in the day and post back.
I'm not 100% sure but I think that this behavior started with the most recent
'Luck You'
-Kevin N.

Update:
Holding @ 23,548 after using the phone for the day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mimon
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

this small App.may help , I've installed it on my own system ,and the results are very positive all the way around , really improves performance noticeably , description & download for Cleanmem
http://majorgeeks.com/CleanMem_d5993.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hartterc
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok I finally figured out the problem. When magicblock is running it forces magicjack to use a tone of resources. The same with magicsilenceplugin. If I don't run them it stays below 7000k while on the phone or off it stays below 7000k..Very interesting???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
redpepper
Dan Should Pay Me


Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 501

PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 8:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your initial assessment of the new magicJack dialer was actually correct. It is indeed a resource hog.

I just ran some more tests with nothing beside the new magicJack dialer functioning and get similar results to Joe, Tom and others in this thread. They match all the previous tests that I ran since the time the new dialer came out.

When the dialer is minimized it sits at around 8,000Kb and when the dialer is maximized the results fluctuate between 18,000Kb and 50,000Kb. When you make a call it goes up a bit further from there.

The largest fluctation appears to be right after you restart the magicJack dialer before you minimize it for the first time. It cleans up some of the heavy duty memory usage after it is minimized once and then re-opened.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    magicJack and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks Forum Index -> Magic Jack Technical Support All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB Turbo Extended Edition © 2010, phpBB Group