magicJack  and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks Forum Index

magicJack and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks


magicJack and magicJack Plus Unofficial Technical Support. Your Magic Jack and Magic Jack Plus phone service information resource
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The audio fix that finally worked for me



 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    magicJack and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks Forum Index -> magicJack Tips, Tricks, and Hacks
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
iz6
MagicJack Newbie


Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:48 pm    Post subject: The audio fix that finally worked for me Reply with quote

Dont know how much this will help anyone, but here is my expierience with MJ. I bought it about 3 months ago. I am running it on a Dell desktop that is about 5 years old. I had wireless broadband internet. I tried all of the tweaks and tips that have ever been mentioned on this board, and would still have very choppy calls, sometimes worse than others but never really good. I had to turn my microphone and speaker volumes wide open to even get close to useable service. I called my internet provider and they let me expierment with different speeds. We went from 756k-3M download speed and and everything in between for the upload. It seemed to work a little better when we set the speeds tp match each other on the upload and download side, but still quality was not very good. Finally I decide to try the cable high speed internet and ...wow, it is jsut as good as my home phone. I even have the slow package at 756K DL and 256 UL. The choppiness is completely gone now. Unbelievable the difference it made. My conclusion is there must be more of a lag time in the wireless high speed than in cable. So if you have the cable option I would highly recommend it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
az2008
MagicJack Sensei


Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 1404
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:01 pm    Post subject: Re: The audio fix that finally worked for me Reply with quote

iz6 wrote:
My conclusion is there must be more of a lag time in the wireless high speed than in cable. So if you have the cable option I would highly recommend it.


I think it's true that wifi introduces more latency. Even a LAN wifi. I'm using cable 256kbs up, 1500kbs down with no problem directly cabled to my router.

But, I still had choppy audio. I flashed my WRT54GL to Tomato's firmware, and enabled QoS to give MJ highest priority. It works fine now. I can be on conference calls with Live Meeting (chewing up bandwidth). MJ works fine.

Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnnyFreightTRAIN
Dan isn't smart enough to hire me


Joined: 08 Aug 2008
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah i cant get it working to a satisfactory level on wireless broadband
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jwryahoo
magicJack Apprentice


Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 27

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have used the MJ with various methods -- all have been good.

I have cable at home and dsl at work. MJ works fineon both. The one at work has many people on the network - but it still works fine.

At home I have it plugged into a TC directly wired into my router -- no problem. Also if I use my laptop (at home) via wireless with the MJ plugged into it -- still no problem.

At work -- with dsl I can use the MJ directly plugged into my desktop -- no problem. I also have two laptops (wireless) at work -- if I plug the MJ into either of them --no problmes.

My personal opinion is that the quality of service very much depends on two things:

1. Your computer. I even use a small netbook Acer Aspire one xp -- works very good.

2. The telephone service that the person you are callilng is using. I have no problem calling anyone -- with the only exception of my Mother-in-Law. She uses a digital internet phone -- which causes conflicts. There is no problem with anyone else.

My 2 cents worth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
greendl
MagicJack Newbie


Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How did you set the QOS priority for MJ in the Tomato firmware?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
az2008
MagicJack Sensei


Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 1404
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

greendl wrote:
How did you set the QOS priority for MJ in the Tomato firmware?


See http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21220750-Giving-priority-to-MJ-traffic-Qos-Tomato-firmware

Be sure to read the entire thread. There are some downsides to standard QoS if your connection speed varies during the day.

Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
couch-potato
Dan isn't smart enough to hire me


Joined: 04 Mar 2008
Posts: 103

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree - I have wireless broadband - and have poor audio quality.

I think using a laptop on wifi is not comparable to wireless broadband, where the tower is 5 miles away.

Unfortunately, cable is not an option for me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matt9876
Dan Should Pay Me


Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Posts: 504

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Running a Linksys WRT54G off Motorola cable modem and 7 megabit ISP service.

My dedicated MagicJack computer WinXP has a matching Linksys-G PCI card.


This is my main phone and it works well most of the time. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scoobydoo
MagicJack Newbie


Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:46 am    Post subject: Re: The audio fix that finally worked for me Reply with quote

az2008 wrote:
iz6 wrote:
My conclusion is there must be more of a lag time in the wireless high speed than in cable. So if you have the cable option I would highly recommend it.


I think it's true that wifi introduces more latency. Even a LAN wifi. I'm using cable 256kbs up, 1500kbs down with no problem directly cabled to my router.

But, I still had choppy audio. I flashed my WRT54GL to Tomato's firmware, and enabled QoS to give MJ highest priority. It works fine now. I can be on conference calls with Live Meeting (chewing up bandwidth). MJ works fine.

Mark


I just flashed my router from DDWRT to Tomato and it instantly cleared up the choppy connection even before tweaking the QOS. No breaks in converstions in 24 hours. This was not the case with DDWRT as every call had breaks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
az2008
MagicJack Sensei


Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 1404
Location: Tempe, AZ

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:18 pm    Post subject: Re: The audio fix that finally worked for me Reply with quote

scoobydoo wrote:
I just flashed my router from DDWRT to Tomato and it instatnly cleared up the choppy connection even before tweaking the QOS. No breaks in converstions in 24 hours. This was not the case with DDWRT as every call had breaks.


Thanks. I had the same experience with DD-WRT. It's much more powerful/feature-filled than Tomato. But, Tomato's QoS worked *much* better for me. I didn't spend a lot of time playing with DD-WRT. I still have my backup router loaded with it. I should switch back and work with it more.

From what I've read, DD-WRT should be better because it uses a newer Linux kernal with TCP Vegas enabled (a congestion avoidance algorithm). DD-WRT also lets you specify your max inbound/outbound speeds to 0 (in the QoS setup) which apparently mean it won't cap your speed. It will just apply QoS priority. The story is, TCP Vegas (alone, or with uncapped QoS) is better than QoS alone. But, I tried 4-5 things and it was choppy.

I have a relatively slow connection (1500/250). Maybe DD-WRT (and TCP Vegas) would be more effective for higher speeds.

Mark
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    magicJack and magicJack Plus Support, Reviews, FAQs and Hacks Forum Index -> magicJack Tips, Tricks, and Hacks All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB Turbo Extended Edition © 2010, phpBB Group