Safe Browsing Reports this Site as attack page

Off topic talk about anything and everything

Moderators: Bill Smith, Pilot

Post Reply
dogcacher
MagicJack User
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:29 am
Location: W. Central PA

Safe Browsing Reports this Site as attack page

Post by dogcacher »

Anybody else seeing this when entering this forum's top page with Firefox 6?

It's reported as initiated by Google safe browsing.

Image
bitstopjoe
Future magicJack CEO
Posts: 2844
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: North East Pennsylvania

Post by bitstopjoe »

Already been discussed and fixed. Look in the lounge section

http://www.phoneservicesupport.com/chro ... 11156.html
Joe Sica
dogcacher
MagicJack User
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:29 am
Location: W. Central PA

Post by dogcacher »

bitstopjoe wrote:Already been discussed and fixed. Look in the lounge section

http://www.phoneservicesupport.com/chro ... 11156.html
Fix was temporary. Warning is back up.

Permanent fix in FF is Iools-Options-Security, uncheck 'Block Reported Attack Sites.'

Not recommended.
bitstopjoe
Future magicJack CEO
Posts: 2844
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 5:25 pm
Location: North East Pennsylvania

Post by bitstopjoe »

Yep sure was... Must have just started again today....
I agree a work around is NOT the answer.....

Though I am using I.E. 8 and have no such error....
Joe Sica
admin
MagicJack Contributor
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:35 am

Post by admin »

Sorry for this issue, it is our hosting provider that has been compromised. We will continue to monitor the situation and try to keep the site from getting these error messages until it is fixed. The problem does not pose any risk to our members, it just affects the major search engines.
User avatar
cell14
Dan Should Pay Me
Posts: 673
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 12:43 am
Location: South FL

Post by cell14 »

Though I am using I.E. 8 and have no such error....
I had the same message on IE 9 for a couple of days; same on Chrome.
I admire the people who ignored the warning( except for the way with thin client as VaHam described) :wink:
Post Reply