New web address!!!
Moderators: Bill Smith, Pilot
-
notdeadyet
- Dan isn't smart enough to hire me
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:26 pm
- Location: Southern Ontario
New web address!!!
anyone else notice the change from magicjacksupport.com to phoneservicesupport.com
got an update for a posting and thought it was spam at first, but all looks good 
I think I found the reason for the new domain
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/sear ... e_id=25908
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/sear ... e_id=25908
-
crackerjack
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 9:32 pm
Here's what you are looking for. Unfortunately, this is just a summary and no specific details of the filings are shown.cell14 wrote:It would be interesting to know the case details...
http://www.udrpsearch.com/wipo/d2013-0334
HOWEVER, there is one thing that is intimated that one would certainly expect: Former CEO Dan was accused of a material breach of the truth as to whether he and other employees of Magicjack had personally participated in these fora as early as 2008. Naturally, he denied this allegation, It was acknowledged by the arbiter the difficulty of substantiating this participation in the absence of sworn personal testimony, but I think we all know the real deal.
Were this case decided by a more traditional hearing in a court of law, likely the outcome would have been different as everyone could have been deposed and sworn under oath.
Good Luck
CrackerJack
MagicJack Customer #73
MagicJack user since May 2007
MagicJack abuser since June 2007
"I gots mo' numbers than a Lotto machine!!!"
CrackerJack
MagicJack Customer #73
MagicJack user since May 2007
MagicJack abuser since June 2007
"I gots mo' numbers than a Lotto machine!!!"
Not necessarily. I have seen people lying under oath in our state courts as boldly as Dan and getting away with it. Especially in non jury cases where you just need one crooked and incompetent judge- we have plenty of them.Were this case decided by a more traditional hearing in a court of law, likely the outcome would have been different as everyone could have been deposed and sworn under oath.
However, this panel's decision is totally ridiculous in multiple ways and just feeds my profound distrust of any arbitrage panels.
Thanks for the link BTW
-
SteveHC
- Dan isn't smart enough to hire me
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:10 am
- Location: Southwest Florida
The answer to the question of why MJ wanted this website to change its web address is pretty simple, actually. Now that the company is indisputably successful (see today's MagicJack News) it doesn't want others to use its name without formal permission or even *inadvertently* imply that they're formally affiliated with MJ. This happens regarding growing companies *very* frequently.
So why would they buy a domain like "verizonphonenumber.com"SteveHC wrote:The answer to the question of why MJ wanted this website to change its web address is pretty simple, actually. Now that the company is indisputably successful (see today's MagicJack News) it doesn't want others to use its name without formal permission or even *inadvertently* imply that they're formally affiliated with MJ. This happens regarding growing companies *very* frequently.
http://whois.domaintools.com/verizonphonenumber.com
This makes no sense!
-
SteveHC
- Dan isn't smart enough to hire me
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 2:10 am
- Location: Southwest Florida
Who knows? I'm sure that they had an interesting reason for doing so when they originally acquired it, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they continue to have any use for it.laserjobs wrote:So why would they buy a domain like "verizonphonenumber.com"
http://whois.domaintools.com/verizonphonenumber.com
This makes no sense!
Well, it looks like that potting magic jack forum, unofficial magic jack support or anything else will bring you to magic jack's web site, even your own search history. You really have to start using the new URL. I think that a lot of new users will not find this site any more.
BTW, Dan apparently still uses that 6 plus years old video- wonder what his daughter thinks about it these days...
BTW, Dan apparently still uses that 6 plus years old video- wonder what his daughter thinks about it these days...