What "Personal" Firewall do YOU recommend?
Moderators: Bill Smith, Pilot
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
What "Personal" Firewall do YOU recommend?
What Free Personal Firewall (i.e., "Software" Firewall) do you recommend?
We hear of ZoneAlarm all the time.
Within this Forum I have seen reference to Comodo and Kerio
Which one have you used/liked (incl version #) with the MJ??? Thanks
(Yes, there are lists here: http://www.firewallleaktester.com/tests.php and http://www.matousec.com/projects/window ... sult-table . But, I want to hear from anyone who has actually used the products)
I am familiar w/ ZoneAlarm and have just started to play w/ Comodo.
Looking for Ability to Run as a Service (i.e. don't need to Login); Performance; Outbound Notification/Blocking; and Small Memory Footprint.
We hear of ZoneAlarm all the time.
Within this Forum I have seen reference to Comodo and Kerio
Which one have you used/liked (incl version #) with the MJ??? Thanks
(Yes, there are lists here: http://www.firewallleaktester.com/tests.php and http://www.matousec.com/projects/window ... sult-table . But, I want to hear from anyone who has actually used the products)
I am familiar w/ ZoneAlarm and have just started to play w/ Comodo.
Looking for Ability to Run as a Service (i.e. don't need to Login); Performance; Outbound Notification/Blocking; and Small Memory Footprint.
Last edited by testing123 on Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:53 am, edited 10 times in total.
Re: What "Personal" Firewall do YOU recommend?
Why don't you use linux and not have to worry about anything? On my Windows Dual boot I just use the standard windows firewall since I never really use windows. But some people hate Linux, don't know why.testing123 wrote:What Free Personal Firewall (i.e., "Software" Firewall) do you recommend?
We hear of ZoneAlarm all the time.
Within this Forum I have seen reference to Comodo and Kerio
Which one have you used/liked (incl version #) with the MJ??? Thanks
Kumar
Will not be on forum until after June 15th.
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: What "Personal" Firewall do YOU recommend?
Kumar, dude, if you have read ANY of my posts ... you will know that I have become a Linux (+ VMware + FreeBSD) ZEALOT ... I run multiple distros on various hardware for various purposes.kumar wrote:Why don't you use linux and not have to worry about anything? On my Windows Dual boot I just use the standard windows firewall since I never really use windows. But some people hate Linux, don't know why.testing123 wrote:What Free Personal Firewall (i.e., "Software" Firewall) do you recommend?
We hear of ZoneAlarm all the time.
Within this Forum I have seen reference to Comodo and Kerio
Which one have you used/liked (incl version #) with the MJ??? Thanks
Kumar
I am asking this question about Windoze because I want to know the answer.
There is a method to my madness.
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Wish there were some Linux hacks for some of the Windoze Mobile phones! Would eat that up like DD-WRT for the routers.kumar wrote:Haha yes, many people use an ipod with Linux, but i prefer it with iTunes for some reason. But thats the only reason I use windows
Kumar
They're even putting Windoze in Cars now ... geez.
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
what 'free' personal firewall do I use? to me free is 'free after rebate'.
so I use OneCare on Vista Ultimate 32 and on Vista Business 32.
I use Panda Internet Security 2008 on XP Pro 64, but turn off their firewall and use the built in XP 64 firewall.
On XP Pro 32 Desktop I use Panda Internet Security 2007,
On the XP Pro 32 laptop I use system mechanic 2007's firewall
On the XP home laptop my wife uses McAfee Internet Security 2006's firewall.
None are listed in your choices. But I suppose our idea's of free are two different things.
so I use OneCare on Vista Ultimate 32 and on Vista Business 32.
I use Panda Internet Security 2008 on XP Pro 64, but turn off their firewall and use the built in XP 64 firewall.
On XP Pro 32 Desktop I use Panda Internet Security 2007,
On the XP Pro 32 laptop I use system mechanic 2007's firewall
On the XP home laptop my wife uses McAfee Internet Security 2006's firewall.
None are listed in your choices. But I suppose our idea's of free are two different things.
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Ha ha, damn. There is not one that could suffice or that you liked enough???mphixson wrote:what 'free' personal firewall do I use? to me free is 'free after rebate'.
so I use OneCare on Vista Ultimate 32 and on Vista Business 32.
I use Panda Internet Security 2008 on XP Pro 64, but turn off their firewall and use the built in XP 64 firewall.
On XP Pro 32 Desktop I use Panda Internet Security 2007,
On the XP Pro 32 laptop I use system mechanic 2007's firewall
On the XP home laptop my wife uses McAfee Internet Security 2006's firewall.
None are listed in your choices. But I suppose our idea's of free are two different things.
And Free for me in this case means "no cost" at all; no up front cost.
PS, I believe you can add any choice to the Poll as well.
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
- SpamBox
- Dan isn't smart enough to hire me
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 4:31 am
- Location: Rocky Mountains Front Range
Sorry missed the link.testing123 wrote: Thanks, I posted that link in the OP.
Aside from protection, what features do you like about it?
Anyway, it's easy to use, does it's job, not too much of a resource hog.
For someone who doesn't know jack about firewalls or computers I would recommend "Online Armor" .
I liked it a lot but it interferred with my torrents, and I couldn't get the settings right so it wouldn't.
I use ZoneAlarm Free because that is the simplest firewall for my clients to use. I use what I recommend whenever possible. ZAF is simple to install, simple to configure, and doesn't use up TOO many resources.
I have been messing with firewalls since I first used AtGuard on my dialup line a dozen years ago.
Donn
I have been messing with firewalls since I first used AtGuard on my dialup line a dozen years ago.
Donn
MagicJack on Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop running WinXP Pro with SP2
These opinions are strictly my own. However, if you really want them, we can negotiate.
These opinions are strictly my own. However, if you really want them, we can negotiate.
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
@SpamBox, @dbarber: Thanks, appreciate the feedback.
SpamBox wrote:...
Sorry missed the link.
Anyway, it's easy to use, does it's job, not too much of a resource hog.
For someone who doesn't know jack about firewalls or computers I would recommend "Online Armor" .
I liked it a lot but it interferred with my torrents, and I couldn't get the settings right so it wouldn't.
dbarber wrote:I use ZoneAlarm Free because that is the simplest firewall for my clients to use. I use what I recommend whenever possible. ZAF is simple to install, simple to configure, and doesn't use up TOO many resources.
I have been messing with firewalls since I first used AtGuard on my dialup line a dozen years ago.
I use stock since it doesn't really matter if you do not use windows much like me....But seriously what is the chance of someone hacking in....also i reformat a lot so doesn't apply for me....BUT on my other dell with only windows (don't ask) i use zonealarm. I still do not think it matters what firewall that we use....Can someone explain? I have not had trouble with my stock firewall ever.
Thanks
Kumar
Thanks
Kumar
Will not be on forum until after June 15th.
-
- Dan Should Pay Me
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Well after playing with Comodo for a little while now .... it has replaced ZoneAlarm Free for me.
Comodo (for me):
1) Is more Stable (example: resuming from Hibernation or running as a Service w/o Login or maintaining ARP Tables correctly)
2) Performs Faster
3) Uses Less Memory
4) Has more finite control over Firewall/Packets (like a "true" hardware firewall)
5) Minus: Can be WAY more complicated IF you use Expert settings (otherwise using Defaults it is as easy as ZoneAlarm)
6) Minus: Comodo 3.0 does not run on Win2k Pro if (you have to use previous version 2.4)
YMMV, but again, I only compared against ZoneAlarm Free -- both are Free so you can't go wrong. ZoneAlarm is still a great product
BTW, I had mistakenly thought that ZoneAlarm was using LESS memory than Comodo until I remembered that ZoneAlarm mem usage is broken up into numerous processes running on your PC:
ZoneAlarm = zlclient.exe + vsmon.exe (approx 14+MB in some tests I did)
Comodo = cfp.exe (approx 3.5MB)
Again, no affiliation with either Product.
Comodo (for me):
1) Is more Stable (example: resuming from Hibernation or running as a Service w/o Login or maintaining ARP Tables correctly)
2) Performs Faster
3) Uses Less Memory
4) Has more finite control over Firewall/Packets (like a "true" hardware firewall)
5) Minus: Can be WAY more complicated IF you use Expert settings (otherwise using Defaults it is as easy as ZoneAlarm)
6) Minus: Comodo 3.0 does not run on Win2k Pro if (you have to use previous version 2.4)
YMMV, but again, I only compared against ZoneAlarm Free -- both are Free so you can't go wrong. ZoneAlarm is still a great product
BTW, I had mistakenly thought that ZoneAlarm was using LESS memory than Comodo until I remembered that ZoneAlarm mem usage is broken up into numerous processes running on your PC:
ZoneAlarm = zlclient.exe + vsmon.exe (approx 14+MB in some tests I did)
Comodo = cfp.exe (approx 3.5MB)
Again, no affiliation with either Product.
Last edited by testing123 on Sun Feb 24, 2008 10:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
I also missed this section!
I know I'm going to be shot down for this but I use Sunbelt on all my systems. 1 xp desktop, 1 xp laptop and 1 xp mce laptop.
Only problems I have ever had was a USB lockup (until I specified drive letters for MJ) and testing fax using internal modem to MJ on same machine (yes I laughed as well). Otherwise my MJs work great both for speech and fax.
I know I'm going to be shot down for this but I use Sunbelt on all my systems. 1 xp desktop, 1 xp laptop and 1 xp mce laptop.
Only problems I have ever had was a USB lockup (until I specified drive letters for MJ) and testing fax using internal modem to MJ on same machine (yes I laughed as well). Otherwise my MJs work great both for speech and fax.